Module 3 — Timing and trading models · Lesson 12 of 23 · 6 min

How to build the daily bias with a repeatable procedure

A five-step procedure to decide before the open whether to look for buys, sells or stay out, how to turn it into a score and how to verify its accuracy over time.

The bias is the preferred direction you expect from price during the day. It isn't a certain forecast: it's a filter that tells you to look only for buys, only for sells, or to stay out. Its value lies in removing improvisation from your trading: before the open you've already decided which side to look at. Here we build a repeatable procedure and, above all, a way to measure how accurate your bias is.

Bias is not a forecast

Let's distinguish:

  • Forecast: "today price will rise to 1.1050".
  • Bias: "today I look only for buys; if the conditions for a buy don't appear, I don't trade".

The second is a rulebook, not a prophecy: you can be right even when price goes the wrong way, if you followed the rules and didn't trade. And you can be wrong without damage if the stop protects.

The five-step procedure

To be done every day, before the London open (10-15 minutes):

Step 1 — Structure on the high timeframe (D1 and H4)

Bullish trend, bearish trend or range? What's the last protected swing? Has there been a recent BOS or CHoCH?

Step 2 — Position in the range (premium/discount)

Relative to the last D1/H4 dealing range, is price in premium or in discount? A rise with price deep in premium has less "room"; in discount it has more.

Step 3 — Nearby liquidity (targets and traps)

Where are the obvious levels above and below? PDH/PDL, week's highs/lows, equal highs/lows, Asian high and low. Which liquidity is nearest? The one price is "attracted" to is the probable target.

Step 4 — Areas of interest

Which high-timeframe order blocks and FVGs sit near price, above and below? Are they consistent with the direction you hypothesise?

Step 5 — Economic calendar

Are there high-impact events today? At what time? Do they change the plan (staying out before the announcement, trading after the reaction)?

Turning the five steps into a score

To make the decision objective, assign each step a score from −1 (bearish) to +1 (bullish), 0 if neutral:

StepConditionScore
1. D1 structureBullish / range / bearish+1 / 0 / −1
1b. H4 structureBullish / range / bearish+1 / 0 / −1
2. Premium/discountDiscount / EQ / premium+1 / 0 / −1
3. Nearest liquidityAbove / equidistant / below+1 / 0 / −1
4. Area of interestConsistent support below / none / resistance above+1 / 0 / −1

Sum between −5 and +5. A possible rule: bullish bias if sum ≥ +3, bearish if ≤ −3, otherwise neutral (no trades). The score removes gut-feel interpretation and gives you measurable data over time.

Extra elements many traders use

  • Reference opens: daily, weekly and monthly open. Price above the opens = bullish pressure; below = bearish.
  • Yesterday's action: is yesterday's close near the high or the low? (Trend days tend to continue, sometimes).
  • Intermarket sentiment: dollar (DXY), yields, equity indices. For example EUR/USD and DXY tend to move in opposite directions.
  • The Asian session: range amplitude and price position.

The more elements you add, the more complex the bias becomes and the greater the risk of overfitting. Keep the system simple.

How to measure the bias's accuracy

The bias is useful only if it has a measurable value. Keep a log:

DateBias (score)Real end-of-day directionOutcome
12/09Bullish (+4)Bullish (close above open)Correct
13/09Neutral (+1)Bearish—
14/09Bearish (−3)BullishWrong

After 60-100 days calculate:

  • Percentage of correct biases (excluding neutrals). A steady 55-60% is already interesting if combined with a good R:R; 50% is a coin toss.
  • Frequency of neutral days.
  • Expectancy in R trading only in the direction of the bias vs. trading both ways.

If trading in the direction of the bias doesn't improve expectancy compared with trading without a filter, your bias adds no value and needs revising.

Typical mistakes

  • Changing bias mid-day after a contrary candle. If the written conditions haven't changed, the bias stays. If structure on the chosen timeframe changes, you redefine it, but you write it in the journal.
  • Forcing a bias when it's neutral: "there's no bias" is a valid answer.
  • Confirming the bias in hindsight: record it before the open (a screenshot with the time).
  • Ignoring news.
  • Confusing bias and target: the bias doesn't say where price will arrive, only from which side to look for setups.
TradingView…
EUR/USD on 4 hours. Build the bias for the last 20 days using the score and check how many were correct. Chart provided by TradingView.

In short

  • Bias is a direction filter, not a forecast.
  • Five-step procedure: HTF structure, premium/discount, nearby liquidity, areas of interest, calendar.
  • Turn it into a score (−5/+5) with written thresholds; below threshold the bias is neutral and you don't trade.
  • Record the bias before the open and measure accuracy over 60-100 days.
  • If the bias doesn't improve expectancy, revise or drop it.

Practical exercise

  1. Every evening write the next day's bias with score and reasons.
  2. The following evening verify: right, wrong or neutral.
  3. After 30 days calculate the percentage of correctness and compare expectancy trading with and without bias.

Test what you've learned

1. What's the difference between bias and forecast?

2. With a bias score between −2 and +2, what do you do (thresholds ±3)?

3. Why record the bias before the open?

4. How do you tell whether the bias has value?

Have a question or want to share your exercise?

Post in the community, or join the free signals room on Telegram.

Educational content, not financial advice. Trading involves risk. ICT is a term referring to the materials of Michael Huddleston: this course is independent and not affiliated.