Module 2 — SMC and ICT concepts · Lesson 7 of 23 · 8 min
Fair Value Gap (imbalance)
How a fair value gap forms, how to measure it and how to handle it in a trading plan.
Definition
A fair value gap (FVG), also called an imbalance, is an area of inefficiency in a three-candle sequence: the stretch of price that the second, very large candle crossed, leaving a 'void' between the first and the third.
Bullish FVG: the high of candle 1 is lower than the low of candle 3. The zone between the two is the gap. Bearish FVG: the low of candle 1 is higher than the high of candle 3.
Why it matters
The hypothesis is that such a fast move left unexecuted orders, and that price tends to come back to 'fill' at least part of that area. In practice a return is often observed, but not always and not all the way.
Using the FVG
- As an entry area: wait for the return into the gap in the direction of the move (mitigation)
- As confirmation: an FVG created by the move that breaks structure strengthens the setup
- As a target: an unfilled opposite FVG is a possible magnet for price
Points of attention
- Ignore gaps that are too small relative to volatility (for example below a fraction of ATR)
- An FVG against the higher-timeframe trend carries less weight
- On some instruments spreads and broker differences change the shape of the candles: always use the same data
Exercise
- Using the three-candle rule, mark all the FVGs of the last week on M15
- Calculate how many were filled at least 50%, and how quickly
- Repeat on three different pairs: results vary a lot and show you how unstable every 'rule' is
Have a question or want to share your exercise?
Post in the community, or join the free signals room on Telegram.
Educational content, not financial advice. Trading involves risk. ICT is a term referring to the materials of Michael Huddleston: this course is independent and not affiliated.